Salomon Law Corp

Areas of Practice

Archive for the ‘Child Support’ Category

Enforcing Family Law Orders By Contempt in California

Monday, May 21st, 2007

In general, family law orders and judgments are enforceable by contempt. Disobedience of any lawful judgment, order or process of the court is a contempt of the authority of the court.

Support orders: Child, spousal and family support orders are based on an obligation arising out of marriage and parentage and are imposed by law. They are enforceable by contempt.

Child custody/visitation orders: The court may invoke its contempt power against a parent who unjustifiably interferes with the other parent’s court-ordered visitation rights or violates an injunction restraining relocation with the children.

Attorney Fees/Costs orders: Need-based attorney fees and costs are awardable by statute in marital proceedings. The award is based on a law-imposed obligation and is enforceable by contempt.

Community property division orders: A spouse who refuses to relinquish a specific item of property or to pay over a portion of a specific fund of money pursuant to a community property division order is subject to enforcement by contempt.

Restraining orders/Family Code protective orders: The court may invoke its contempt power to compel compliance with valid protective orders and restraining orders issued in a domestic relations proceeding.

Statute of Limitations: The contempt remedy for noncompliance with a court order made under the Family Code is subject to a statute of limitations. For an alleged failure to pay child, family or spousal support, the contempt action must be commenced no later than three years from the date the payment was due.

A contempt cause of action for nonpayment of support may be broken into separate ‘counts’ for each month payment was not made in full.

A contempt action to enforce any other order made under the Family Code must be brought within two years from the time the alleged contempt occurred.

Facts needed to prove contempt: The facts generally necessary to establish prima facie contempt of a family law order are: (1) rendition of a valid order; (2) the citee’s knowledge of the order and; (3) the citee’s willful disobedience of the order.

Punishment: Contempt punishments for a first time violation is county jail for up to 5 days or 120 hours of community service or pay a fine of $1000 for each count. For a second time violation, the person can be put in county jail for up to 5 days and do up to 120 hours of community service, and pay a fine of $1000 for each count. For a third and subsequent violation, the person can be put in county jail for up to 10 days and do up to 240 hours of community service and pay a find of $1000 for each count.

The Court can also order the person found in contempt to pay attorney fees and costs to the other person.

CAN A CALIFORNIA CHILD SUPPORT ORDER BE MODIFIED?

Thursday, May 10th, 2007

Child support orders are modifiable long after a judgment’s finality. Subject to certain limitations, child support orders are modifiable at any time as the court deems necessary.

The family law court has primary jurisdiction over modifications. Once a marital status/dissolution action has been filed, the family law court’s jurisdiction attaches. Disputes over the modification of child support should ordinarily be heard in the family law action in which the original support obligation was imposed. Many times, parents relocate to different states or countries and in that instance, there is a bases for shift in jurisdictional situs.

Reason for Modification: Generally, courts will not modify or revise a child support order unless there has been a ‘material change of circumstances.’ There are no rigid guidelines for determining when the circumstances have sufficiently changed to warrant a child support modification. The determination is made on a case-by-case basis and may turn on the facts particular to each individual case (such as ability to pay or need).

Ability to pay: A change in either parent’s financial position is not an automatic ground for modification. The Court will examine both parties’ circumstances and will evaluate the circumstances according to statutory factors set forth in the Family Code.

Parent’s increased wealth: The obligor parent’s enhanced wealth often itself will be grounds for increasing the child support level.

Earning Capacity vs. Actual Earnings: The parent’s actual earnings are not always the controlling question when calculating the obligor’s ability to pay. The Court has discretion to consider the earning capacity of a parent as opposed to the parent’s income, so long as it is in the best interests of the children.

Can both parents agree to modify support? The parents may agree as between themselves to increase court-ordered child support payments at any time and under any circumstances. The agreement should be reduced to a writing and signed by both parties.

Can my ex-spouse’s/new mate’s income be considered? Trial courts may not consider the amount of support the income of a parent’s subsequent spouse or nonmarital partner makes except in ‘extraordinary cases.’ For example, new mate income may be considered if child would otherwise suffer ‘extreme and severe’ hardship.

Bottom Line: Child support modification is determined on a case-by-case basis with the best interest of the minor child at the forefront.


 

, , , GameSpot.com, , , GNU.org, , , , , Google.co.uk, , , , , Grants.gov, desi, mes, , , , Harvard.edu, , tobago, , insults, , , , , , mourning, , , bait, , , , , HUJI.ac.il, , , , , , , , House.gov, chow, , , , , nautical, , HP.com, , , tsa, , , HTMLHelp.com, , glitch, , IEEE.org, , , , , , , , , , , , , plexus, , , , , , , , gemeente, , , , IETF.org, , defective, , sandwich, , , , , ,